1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following is added to the text of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the third sentence of the first instance judgment, the following contents are added to the third sentence. The plaintiff asserts that it is difficult to escape from the danger that the plaintiff is faced through the police's influence and corruption because of the national and religious complexity of Hungary, and the vulnerable state index is high, and the police's influence and corruption cannot escape from the danger that the plaintiff is faced.

However, according to the evidence No. 5 and No. 6, it can be acknowledged that the Republic of Korea is a country that guarantees the freedom of religion, and that people who actually have classical, Islamic, electric communications, etc. are engaged in religious activities.

Although there is an internal and religious dispute and there is a little lack of government-level measures to cope with it, the Austrian government seems to be in the process of resolving these disputes and conflicts.

In addition, even according to the plaintiff's statement, threats to the plaintiff is merely a small traditional religious group, and it does not seem that the Naria government does not provide appropriate protection to it.

The plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.