1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A and B jointly and severally commit 499,99,998 won and 166,66,666 won among them.

1. The plaintiff's indication of the claim was trusted each false financial statements prepared as a result of the window dressing settlement of the fiscal year from 1993 to 1995 by the defendants (the defendant A and B were involved in the time comprehensive construction corporation's settlement of accounts in the fiscal year from 1993 to 1995, and the defendant C was involved in the time comprehensive construction corporation's settlement of accounts in the fiscal year from 1995) with the time comprehensive construction corporation. Nov. 17, 1994; Dec. 26, 1995; and Dec. 9, 1996; each bond guarantee insurance contract was concluded on December 19, 1996; the part of the claim (the plaintiff was finally affirmed by Seoul Central District Court Decision 2004Ga12085; Seoul High Court Decision 2005Na2446; 2007Da72848, Jul. 28, 2008).

A. With respect to Defendant A and B, 166,66,66,66 won, part of the damage related to the corporate bond insurance contract of November 17, 1994, and 166,66,66 won, part of the damage related to the corporate bond insurance contract of December 26, 1995, and 166,66,66 won, part of the damage related to the corporate bond insurance contract of December 9, 1996, and damages for delay against each of the above money

B. As to the defendant C, 300,000,000 won, part of the damage related to the bond guarantee insurance contract dated December 9, 1996, and the claim for the payment of damages for delay

2. Applicable provisions;

(a) Defendant A: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

(b) Defendant B and C: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)