1. The defendant's KRW 10,000,00 for each of the plaintiffs and 5% per annum from May 17, 2013 to October 26, 2016, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) D A was married to E, and under its chain, Plaintiff A, F, and Plaintiff B. 2) D died on or around December 2001, and D maintained a de facto marriage relationship with Nonparty G and died on or around December 2007.

B. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet is completed in the D future, but the ownership transfer registration was completed on March 21, 2008, which was after D died, on December 21, 2007.

C. 1) Around October 2012, F had married with the Defendant, and completed the marriage report on April 9, 2013. 2) However, around May 16, 2013, F completed a meeting of Edddton club with the Defendant, and went into dispute while the Defendant was on duty and returned to the Plaintiff, and was found to have been dead in the vicinity of the next place.

3) On March 7, 2016, the Defendant was indicted as charges of death resulting from abandonment under the Daegu District Court Residential Support 2016Rahap9, and the said court on June 23, 2016, the injured party (F) went against the Defendant (Defendant) who was the wife at the club of the same club at a speed of 20 km to 30 km to the speed of 30 km to the city. During this process, the vehicle speed without the vehicle speed and the balance was lost, resulting in the death of the head and the blood transfusion.

Considering the fact that the speed of the vehicle 20 km or 30 km per hour is not soften that people can safely drink during the process, that at the time the victim dices alcohol in the club, and was in a progress of interest by dispute with the defendant, it can be said that the victim could have sufficiently predicted in light of the empirical rule that the victim can do so by getting off or maintaining balance due to the act of unloading from the vehicle at the same speed as above.

Nevertheless, the victim is the party who driven the vehicle at the time and the victim's wife.