(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.09.19 2014노510

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.09.19 2014노510

경범죄처벌법위반

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles did not mean that the Defendant was engaged in the business of leaving the door in the instant head office, and that the Defendant was engaged in the business of leaving the door in the underground, and there was no intention to make a false report at the time.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 300,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court and the lower court, namely, ① According to the voice files in which the Defendant’s content of the instant case was recorded, the Defendant sent a 112-line phone call to the 112-line, and then sent a e-line to the Public Security Center: “I am going back to the Public Security Center; I am going back to the hyp; I am going forward to the hyp; I am a hyp on the ground of the hyp; and I am a hyp from the outside. I am to this end, I am a hyp from the police station’s question.”

z. Pool SPS, which does not carry out any such establishment.

Between men and women of family heading, they shall not engage in beering or masting so as to be sound between men and women.

more than 20 cherb.

It is now today today's.

In the case of police officers, Albain S.

(2) The police officer, upon receipt of the Defendant’s report, did not find out any circumstances to deem that the police officer, who was called upon upon receipt of the Defendant’s report, was not in the head of the instant head office, and did not properly explain the location of the head of the instant head office and the method of the business to leave the place of the head of the instant head office before or before the report was made, and that the police officer did not find any circumstances to deem that the police officer was in the head of the instant head office. (3) At the time, the Defendant was accompanied to the head of the instant head office upon the police officer’s request, but did not properly explain the location of the head office and the method of the business to leave the head of the instant head office and asked the police officer to find

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2014.04.18 2014고정411

-서울동부지방법원 2014.06.03 2014고단701

-의정부지방법원 2014.09.01 2013고단3437

-울산지방법원 2013.4.5.선고 2013고단381 판결

-대전지방법원 2013.3.22.선고 2012고합549 판결