Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 1, 2015, from around 21:20 to 22:00 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as: (a) at the E main store operated by the victim D in Ansan-gu Mayang-gu Mayang-si, the victim recommended the Defendant to return home without drinking alcohol; (b) the victim, thereby making the Defendant go to the Defendant “a Chewing year”; and (c) having other customers go to go to the Defendant, and then allowing other customers to leave the place, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business.

2. On December 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender on the charge of interference with business by G while on the part of the police stationF forces affiliated with G in the Gyeonggi-do Police Station, where he was reported at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) around 22:05 and 112; and (b) was arrested by the Defendant.

Defendant refused a request from the above G to accompany the patrol lane, and assaulted the chest of H in the border belonging to the said patrol zone by keeping the chest together one time, with drinking, and continuing to do so. Defendant assaulted that the right-hand part of the above G would have the right-hand part of the string of the string of the string.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written victims;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of official duties);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence, protection observation, and community service order in April 2014 due to the crime of injury, etc. at the Suwon guard method and committed the instant crime during the period of suspended sentence; favorable circumstances: the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects himself.