logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2015.04.09 2014고단1362
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 15, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court on November 15, 2005, a fine of KRW 5 million for the same crime in the same court on May 24, 2006, and a fine of KRW 5 million for the same crime at the Suwon District Court on July 19, 2012. On August 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months for the same crime in the same site of the Suwon District Court.

(This judgment was finalized on August 17, 2012). (Criminal Facts)

1. On October 13, 2012, the Defendant was punished twice or more due to drinking without a license (No. 14853, 2014), but on October 13, 2012, the Defendant driven CBMW car from the front line of the head of Pyeongtaek-si, which is under the influence of 0.129% of blood alcohol level, without obtaining a license for driving at around 01:50, Oct. 13, 2012.

2. Driving, etc. without a license on April 12, 2014 (No. 14966).

A. On April 12, 2014, the Defendant was punished twice or more due to driving under the influence of alcohol as above, but the Defendant driven a BM car at a section of approximately 200 meters from the front of the head of Si/Gu in which it is difficult to identify the trade name of the Si/Gu in Busan at the head of Si/Gu without obtaining a driving license at around 23:00 on April 12, 2014.

B. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act.

The name and resident registration number(G) of kind F who was designated as a drinking driving was used in order to conceal the fact that the traffic of the Busan Southern Police Station and the traffic safety department are asked for personal information from E at the time and place of the port of call.

C. The Defendant was aware of the forgery of a private signature and the use of a false investigation or signature.

shall be exercised at the time and place described in the subsection.

arrow