1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.

On July 3, 2017, at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle A, the insured vehicle A, and the insured vehicle A, at the time of the accident at the time of the accident, had been driving in one-lane of the two-lanes of the road between the two-lanes of the road at the time of the accident, and the insured vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff vehicle”) in the situation of the collision between the two-lanes of the road at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident, trying to make a right-hand of the Defendant’s insured vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) which was stopped in order to get passengers to get passengers to get passengers to get off on the two-lanes of the road at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident, and the part, such as the back of the right-hand side of the Plaintiff vehicle at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident, and the purport of the entire pleading as a whole statement

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant’s negligence on the instant accident was 80% and claimed 183,200 won, and damages for delay from the day immediately after the date of the final payment, among the insurance proceeds paid by the Plaintiff.

(In this Court, the plaintiff asserts that the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle is at least 70%, and is at least 70%. First, the plaintiff's assertion that the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle is at least 70%.

In light of all the circumstances, such as the above facts of recognition and the background of the accident, the degree of conflict, and the degree of shock, it is reasonable to deem that the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle is negligent at least 55% of the accident of this case. Thus, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is groundless.

(2) The judgment of the court below regarding the accident of this case cannot affect the conclusion of this case as follows. However, the judgment of the court below is omitted.