logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.11.26 2013고단1861
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 6 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 23, 2010, Defendant A’s violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) driven a funch-free vehicle from approximately 50 meters away from the front-way path in the mutual influence in the upstream-gu, Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, whose blood alcohol content is 0.137% under the influence of alcohol at around 15:30 on May 23, 2010 to the front day of the same 506-4.

2. Defendant B

A. At around 15:50 on May 27, 2010, the Defendant driven a G-low-low-car car at a about 500 meters range of 678-1 front-dong, Ansan-dong without a driver’s license on May 27, 2010.

B. On March 22, 2012, the Defendant of the offering of a bribe driving a passenger car with a new wall H on March 22, 2012

On March 22, 2012, when a traffic accident occurs and leaving the scene, the traffic investigation department of the Dongsan-dong Police Station in the Dongsan-gu, Ansan-gu, Ansan-si requested that the police officer in charge of the above case "I who belongs to the above police station's traffic investigation department of the police officer in charge of the above case and who was inside and outside of the defendant of the above police station" "I may deduct the volume of the student before and after his/her college students", and I agreed as the end of the defect "I may deduct the volume of the student who must agree with the victim without any conditions".

On March 22, 2012, the Defendant issued a copy of the KRW 1 million check to I before the building of the above transport survey system, upon making a solicitation that “the case of children is to be well closed.”

As above, the Defendant offered a bribe of KRW 1 million to a public official in relation to his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the prosecution of I;

1. Statement made by the J concerning the defendant A in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect;

1. License register;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports, reports on the status of drivers, and reports on the status of drivers;

1. Article 148-2 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 10790, Jun. 8, 201) and Article 44(1)2 of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 10790, Jun. 8, 201); Defendant B: Road Traffic Act.

arrow