Of the judgment of the court below of first instance, the list of offenses in attached Form 1 among the crimes in the judgment of the court below and the second judgment.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the court below against Defendant A (two years of imprisonment) and each sentence of the court below against Defendant A (two years of imprisonment: imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes listed in the separate list Nos. 1 through 6 among the crimes listed in the judgment of the court below: imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes listed in the separate list No. 7 through 13 among the crimes listed in the judgment of the court below; and the crimes listed in the separate list No. 2, 3, and 4 among the crimes listed in the judgment of the court below, are too unreasonable.

2. An ex officio determination of Defendant A's grounds for appeal was made ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal, the part against Defendant A in this Court No. 2011No3981, which is the case of appeal against the judgment of the court of first instance, and the part against Defendant A in this Court No. 2012No282, which is the case of appeal against the judgment of the court of second instance, was consolidated in the proceedings for oral pleadings. Each of the crimes in the judgment of the court of first instance as to Defendant A among the crimes in the judgment of the court of first instance, and the crimes in the attached Table No. 7 through No. 13 among the crimes in the judgment of the court of first instance No. 2, and the crimes in the judgment of the court of first instance No. 2, No. 2, 3, and 4 among the crimes in the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be sentenced to a single sentence within the scope of punishment aggravated pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. As such, the part against Defendant A and the part of the judgment of the judgment of the judgment of the judgment of the judgment of the judgment of the crime No.

(2) The court below's decision on the grounds for appeal 2.3. The court below's decision on the grounds for appeal 1.

A. It is recognized that Defendant AT Defendant AT recognized all of the instant crimes and deemed that he would normally perform military service, and that his mistake is against his depth, and that Defendant AT’s age has yet to go beyond his age, and his family appeals the Defendant’s preference.

However, the instant crime is a duty of military service.