The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The sentence (six months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and the degree of injury suffered by the victims is not weak.

The Defendant did not agree with the victims until the time of the trial, and did not endeavor to recover from the damage.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case, and the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure; however, Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. is amended as follows: "Article 2 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (wholly amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016)" with "Article 2 (2) and 2 (1) 1 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (wholly amended by Act No. 13718)."