A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 17, 2017, at around 19:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by force for about 30 minutes by avoiding disturbance, i.e., “A” main point of “D,” operated by the victim C, which is located in C, on the ground that the Defendant prevented the Defendant from smoking, and thus interfered with the victim’s main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act [the scope of recommendation] for the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the grounds for sentencing] [the person subject to special mitigation] [the person subject to special mitigation]] and the reason for special mitigation [including efforts to recover damage] : The sentence] of the mitigated area of punishment (including the person subject to serious effort to recover damage] : The defendant has a number of records of punishment for the same crime, and there are considerable records of punishment for the same crime. The circumstances favorable to the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period during which the same crime was suspended (the current period of probation is limited to the intention): The victim recognized errors and reflects the motive and background of the crime, the means of the crime, the degree of interference with duties, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and various kinds of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the records and changes.