Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On June 23, 2019, the Defendant received a claim from the victim C ( South Korea and 70 years of age) that CCTV light is too clear in front of the residence of the Defendant located in the Steel Group B of the Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on June 23, 2019, and got the victim and the victim were boomed one time with his left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV images CDs by the police protocol against some of the defendant's legal statements C;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that the victim alleged in the judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel are forced to assault the defendant's wife, and thus, the defendant's act is nothing more than provoking against the victim by provoking his hands. Therefore, even if the above act constitutes an outer assault, even if it falls under such an act, it is nothing more than an illegal aggressive act, but it is nothing more than a passive act to protect the defendant's defendant's wife, and it is nothing more than a passive act (port) to protect the defendant's wife, and therefore, it cannot be viewed as an act contrary to social rules.

2. According to CCTV images taken by the situation at the time of the instant case, it is recognized that the victim was able to find the Defendant and his wife in the process of vision, and there is no circumstance that the victim tried to commit assault or harm to the Defendant’s wife, but in the above situation, it cannot be deemed that the victim’s friendly relationship with the Defendant at once constitutes a passive defense to protect the Defendant’s identity, or that it does not go against social rules.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's above assertion cannot be accepted.

Sentencing.