beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1,133,469,532 to the Plaintiff; and (b) KRW 5% per annum from June 18, 2014 to January 27, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company engaged in the business of observation, prediction, statistics, and research of weather conditions and the import, manufacture, sale, and service of related devices. The Defendant is a company engaged in the business of construction, extension, and improvement of facilities necessary for the operation of aircraft, passenger, cargo disposal facilities, and airport. The Intervenor joining the Defendant is a company engaged in the business of developing mobile communications, measuring instruments, and industrial equipment.
B. On August 4, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a purchase agreement with the Defense Acquisition Program Administration to supply air automatic weather observation equipment up to December 10, 201. On September 2, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into the said contract with the Defendant for the supply of goods (hereinafter “instant goods supply agreement”) with the terms that the Plaintiff would be supplied with eight years of age, which is the component element of the aviation automatic weather observation equipment (hereinafter “runway long distance reduction”; hereinafter “instant goods”). The main contents of the contract are [goods supply contract]: The Plaintiff: Defendant 3 [price for goods] to pay KRW 317,152,00 (excluding value-added tax) as the price for goods, but the Plaintiff shall pay KRW 317,152,00 (excluding value-added tax) as the price for goods.
Article 4 [Supply of Goods]
1. B shall provide Party A with the goods specified in this Agreement not later than October 30, 201.
2. B shall deliver the whole quantity of the goods on the supply date specified in the preceding paragraphs to the place designated by A, and request for inspection and examination, and shall be deemed to have been completed upon receipt by A after passing an inspection and examination (in the process of inspection and examination at a demand source).
4. Eul shall refer to the penalty for delay calculated by deducting the penalty for delay from the price of the goods for one day of delay from the total price of the goods, which falls under 0.90% of the total price of the goods if the delay in supply occurs.
Article 6 (Inspection and Inspection of Goods)
4. The term "qualified goods" means the following conditions:
(1) A product that has passed an inspection and examination at a demand center.