logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.09.17 2017가합13763
매매대금반환
Text

All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a motor vehicle manufacturer, and the plaintiffs are the motor vehicles purchaser from the defendant.

B. The Defendant, while manufacturing Kitlers and Nit container shower vehicles (hereinafter “the instant troper vehicles”), set up an open alkin loading box on the instant troper vehicle in accordance with the attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter “the instant troper”) and fixed the loading on the twebin.

C. The Defendant: (a) attached a control tower (attached Form No. 4) at the shower of the instant vehicle at the time of the shower of the vehicle; and (b) linked to the loading of the instant cargo, the Defendant installed a device capable of opening or closing the upper cover of the instant cargo (attached Form No. 2) of the instant cargo (attached Form No. 3) by a brucing operation.

The Defendant, at the lower bottom of the loading box of this case, set up two air conditioners (attached Form No. 5), attached two air conditioners and two air conditioners connected to air conditioners at the shower of the vehicle, attached two air conditioners (attached Form No. 6), and installed devices capable of opening and closing the back of the loading box of this case by linking electric power vessels.

E. The Plaintiffs concluded each contract from the Defendant to purchase KRW 72,00,000 (hereinafter “each contract of this case”) each of the instant renal vehicles and the loading of the instant cargo manufactured by the Defendant as indicated below (hereinafter “each contract of this case”).

A BD E F H AB AD AB AD AD AB AD AB AD Ac AE AE AE AG AH AI AJ

F. Without approval on December 13, 2017, Plaintiff B was sentenced to suspension of indictment for violating the Automobile Management Act on the grounds of the fact that Plaintiff B installed and operated the instant Tracler on the instant Tracler in the instant Tracler.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 8, 11, 16, 23 (if there are various numbers, including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and images and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion (1) The defendant asserted in this case on the Traler vehicle.

arrow