The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

The Defendant of the instant facts of construction and the lower court’s judgment considered that his cell phone and computer are hackinged by any person from the end of June 2013. The Defendant reported to the police station, the Internet Promotion Agency, and the Seoul National Police Agency Cyber Investigative Team, etc., but did not receive the report from these agencies, but reported to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office and reported it to the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office to the effect that people, including family, do not believe their horses, and, if not accepted the report, did not look at the body of his body.

On November 8, 2013, at around 22:40, the Defendant: (a) opened a fuel cycle for the E-motor vehicle operated by himself/herself using the off-line pumps; (b) moved the gasoline in the fuel tank from the nearby marina on the same day to the string line of a car in the size of 13cc wide of 13cc wide, and then loaded the above water tank into the string line of a car.

At around 01:30 on November 9, 2013, the Defendant, while taking meals in front of the office building of the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul. In the future, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol in front of the office building, operated a car without carrying gasoline, which is a dangerous object that may fluence as above, in drinking alcohol, in the front of the office building, and went into the office building after passing through a public prosecutor’s office building, passing through a public office building on the front of the office building and parked the car in front of the office building.

At around 01:35 on the same day, the Defendant reported a computer hacking case to the Protection Board F in the office building, and then suggested mobile phones, etc. after entering the office on duty of the office building, and demanded a computer hacking investigation to be the head of the office. However, the cell phone analysis, etc. from the prosecution investigator G, etc. who was on duty while on duty, cannot be conducted in the office on duty.