logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.10.31 2018고단6274
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 11, 2018, from around 15:00 to around 15:30 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force of approximately 30 minutes and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by demanding the victim to return home to the Defendant under the influence of the victim E, which was operated by the victim E in Incheon Bupyeong-gu.

2. The Defendants who interfered with the Defendants’ performance of their official duties at around 15:56 on the same day requested the Defendants to return home to the Defendants by the police officer H and security guards belonging to the Bupyeong Police Station G police box called out after receiving 112 reports that “the persons engaged in the alcohol conduct,” and at the same place. Defendant B was removed from the rank box attached to the right side of the outer boom while taking a bath to the above security guards H, and Defendant A was removed from the rank box attached to the right side of the outer boom. The above security guards “the person engaged in the alcohol conduct,” and Defendant A died of this b.

"....................... were assaulted as a elblue with the face

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by each police officer of J, K, L, or M;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 36(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The following conditions for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are determined by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances: the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the instant crime, means and method, circumstances after the instant crime was committed, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process.

arrow