1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

(In view of the evidence newly submitted by the court of first instance after being duly admitted and examined, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable). The following is added between the fourth 10th e.g., and the first 11th e.g., the first e.

In addition, "the State, a local government, or a public institution (hereinafter referred to as "the State, etc.")" shall be referred to

() Even if the completion of the acquisition by prescription for the land in possession is asserted, the State, etc. is unable to submit the document regarding the procedure for acquisition of the land, in view of the purpose and purpose of the possession, if it appears that the possibility that the State, etc. lawfully acquired the ownership by undergoing the procedure for acquisition of public property at the time of the commencement of possession cannot be ruled out, it is difficult to deem that the State, etc., knowingly knowingly occupied the land without permission without permission without being aware of such circumstance without the legal requirements for acquisition of ownership. In such a case, the presumption of possession with autonomy cannot be said to have been broken (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Da33866, Aug. 19,

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the plaintiffs' principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.