logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고단2694
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer the means of access by financial institutions to any third person;

On August 8, 2013, the Defendant transferred the means of access that is linked to 12 accounts as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table between the first and second police officers, as well as the dispatch of passbooks, cash cards, etc. connected to the post office account (E) account in the name of the State Party in Seoul.

2. Around October 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face by drinking, on the ground that the Defendant’s franchise in the Defendant’s car parked in the underground parking lot of the F building in Busan Dong-gu, Busan does not immediately work for the victim C (24 years of age) in his car.

3. On March 2015, the Defendant: (a) called the victim C to the victim with the knowledge that the victim C was under investigation by the police due to the suspicion of transfer of head of Tong in the name of the head of Tong in the name of Busan on the beginning of Busan on March 2015; and (b) the victim threatened the victim by saying, “I am sing, singn, and do not singn, and if I singn, I am singn's singn's singn's singn's singn's singn

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on details of financial transactions, such as materials for opening accounts, certificates of all registered matters, and application for opening accounts;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Matters, Articles 49(4)1 and 6(3)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (a transfer by means of access), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of violence), Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reason for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is that each of the crimes of this case was defective, and the account in which the defendant distributed.

arrow