logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.01.13 2016가단124105
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant each indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1 among the land size of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 697 square meters.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Replotting (1) A replotting disposition (1) was conducted on September 29, 1955 with regard to the land located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, 7,485 square meters (hereinafter “the land before the instant replotting”), which was divided into D, J, and K land, and was divided into D, J, and D land, and the size of D land was 3,898 square meters, and the size of D land was 3,892 square meters (185 square meters, 1187.4 square meters, hereinafter “the instant land”) and 4,80 square meters (hereinafter “instant replotting disposition”).

(2) On February 13, 1969, the registration of ownership preservation was completed in the future of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 13, 1969, which was scheduled to be substituted as a road site after the instant replotting disposition, and the ownership transfer registration was completed in the future of the Defendant on August 16, 1988 after succession to the Defendant.

(3) On June 26, 2008, the instant F land was divided into the size of 697.6 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”); (2) G road 3,252.1 square meters; (3) H road 332.4 square meters; and (4) I road 308.2 square meters; and (55.4/697.6 square meters of the instant land among the instant land as of the closing date of pleadings following a change in co-ownership; and (3) as of the closing date of pleadings, the instant F land was finally registered for the transfer of ownership on the share of 55.4/

B. (1) The Plaintiff’s acquisition of the Plaintiff’s housing ownership (1) had a number of unauthorized buildings on the land before the instant land substitution, and the owner of each building occupied the site of the relevant building exclusively. The Plaintiff’s housing owned was located in a place prior to the instant land substitution disposition prior to the instant land substitution disposition, including the cement machine, paper, roof, and cement block block 67.03 square meters (hereinafter “instant housing”).

(2) Korea is equivalent to the area of the building occupied by recognizing such occupation relations.

arrow