logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.07.04 2014노371
주차장법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty (two million won of a fine) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below has some favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant misjudgments the defendant's wrong and the health of the defendant is not good due to the above cancer surgery, the defendant's 80 senior citizens who are married with her husband and live together with the rental profit. However, the court below seems to have partially reduced the fine of the summary order by reflecting such circumstances, and the criteria for handling similar cases. The crime of this case is committed in a similar case where the defendant uses an attached parking lot which cannot be used for purposes other than the parking lot as a store in order to receive monthly rent, and the crime of this case is not good, and it is disadvantageous to the defendant, such other unfavorable circumstances as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., such as the crime of this case's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow