Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of B Kazine 6 B Trazine Cargo Vehicles.

A person who intends to operate passenger transport business shall prepare a business plan and obtain a license from the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry

Nevertheless, on August 14, 2014, the Defendant used the above vehicle without obtaining a license for passenger transport business from the competent authority, and operated 4,000 won by having a customer not in possession of freight at a distance of about 4 km from the old world in front of the sexual repathal of the Seongbuk-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu to the front of the same Eup/Myeon high-speed apartment located at the same Eup/Myeon rate, and operated the same year.

9. Around 19:51, at around 19:51, customers who do not possess cargo at a distance of about 4 km from the street in front of the sexual renal apartment located in the same Eup to the front of the vice-permanent apartment located in the same Dongpo-Eup in the same Dongpo-si and operated an act of passenger transport business type by receiving KRW 4,000, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each report on commercial transport activities, each video CD-related statute;

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting an offense, and subparagraph 1 of Article 90 of the Passenger Transport Service Act that selects punishment, and Articles 4 (1) of the same Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the same Act have been punished five times by a fine due to the crime of several methods identical to this case in the past, and the same type as the order shall be determined in consideration of the circumstances where repeated crimes of money have been committed even though the amount of fine has been reduced several times by filing a request for formal trial against the summary order in the process, and where it is advantageous to the future that it would not be re-offending after