beta
Text
1. Attached Form;
1. The Defendants indicated in the list are as shown in the attached Table among the 69 square meters in Nam-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City.
1. Defendants listed in the list respectively.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On February 24, 1915, AD was assessed on the land unregistered on February 24, 1915 (hereinafter “instant land”). The instant land cadastre indicated “AD” in the owner column and “AF” in the address column as “AE” and “AF” in the owner column. B. The “AD”, which was established in the Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, or resided, is written as “AH” in the permanent domicile column of the certified transcript.
C. The Plaintiff’s tide AI (Death on February 16, 1976) occupied the instant land by purchasing the instant land and the instant land from AD in 1970 and for the purpose of peaceful performance. The Plaintiff, around August 198, purchased a “YYAJ (hereinafter “SJ”) adjacent to the instant land,” and installed a brupted rice with the instant land and the instant land as one an theme, and thereafter occupied and used the instant land from February 2, 2001 when constructing a new house on the land of Nonparty.
On the other hand, AD died on May 10, 1949 and succeeded to AK solely, and AK died on August 22, 1975 and succeeded to AL 1/20, AM, and N, 4/20, AO for 1/20, AP for 4/20, Q 2/20, and 4/20 for B respectively, and thereafter the successors and inheritance shares are as shown in attached Tables 2 and 3.
[Ground of recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap's statements or videos (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) in Gap's evidence 1 to 8, and the result of inquiry into the AR Dong community service center by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Around 1970, the network AI, the plaintiff's husband's assertion, occupied the land of this case from AD, and the plaintiff succeeded to the possession of the above land and used it until now.
As can be seen, insofar as the Plaintiff occupied the instant land in a peaceful and open manner with the intention of ownership for not less than 20 years, the Plaintiff acquired the prescription of possession on April 30, 199, which was calculated from April 30, 2019, against the Defendants, the heir of AD, the owner on the land cadastre of the instant land.