1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The parties' assertion

A. (1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant maintained a Buddhist relationship with Gyeongbuk University C, which was around June 201, after having sexual intercourse with her mother in the East Eastern Youth.

Before the marriage, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to divorce, and the Plaintiff did not answer the claim, but the Defendant subsequently requested the Plaintiff to continue divorce.

Although the plaintiff made it clear to the defendant that he did not have the intention of divorce, the defendant demanded a divorce continuously until January 2012.

Since then, when the Plaintiff avoided the Defendant’s her marriage with the Defendant, the Defendant threatened the Defendant to open a Buddhist relationship with the workplace, home, and church on June 2012, and the Plaintiff transferred KRW 20 million on June 21, 2012 to the Defendant, but the Defendant, around March 2013, threatened the Plaintiff to know that the Plaintiff would not have been divorced while demanding the divorce, upon the Plaintiff’s director living in Daegu to move to Seoul, the Plaintiff would be at the end of June, 2013, and demanded that the Defendant pay KRW 3 billion in return for the annulment of the marriage promise.

The Plaintiff, on July 18, 2013 and July 30, 2013, remitted a total of KRW 100 million to the Plaintiff, on condition that the relationship with the wheels is settled.

However, around January 2014, the Defendant called the church accompanying the Plaintiff’s wife D and became aware of the unsound relationship. On 2014, the Defendant also known the Plaintiff’s parents of the Plaintiff by telephone, and sexual harassmented the wife by sending letters to the wife D.

(2) 10 million won, which the Plaintiff remitted to the Defendant, was insufficient to threaten the Defendant to know about an inhumanity relation to the Plaintiff’s surrounding person, and was made by the Defendant’s coercion. As such, the delivery of the written application for modification of the purport of the instant donation and the cause of the claim was made by the Defendant, and either the said donation either cancelled the intent of the instant donation or made a conditional declaration on the condition that the Defendant did not notify the Plaintiff of an inhumanity relation to the Plaintiff’