logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.23 2014나46881
자동차인도 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: the defendant's new argument at the trial of the court of first instance under section 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following determination to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with

2. Additional matters to be determined;

C. Finally, the defendant alleged to the effect that he bona fide acquired the right of pledge on the motor vehicle as a security for his claim against B, but since the motor vehicle is not the subject of the right of pledge (Article 9 of the Act on Mortgage on Motor Vehicles and Other Specific Movables). Therefore, the above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow