(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.07.18 2018가단844

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.07.18 2018가단844

건물명도등

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From January 22, 2017, the above A

subsection (b).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 21, 2010, the Plaintiff leased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant as KRW 12 months for lease period, KRW 2 million for lease deposit, and KRW 200,000 for monthly rent.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

The instant lease agreement has been implicitly renewed since then. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking payment of KRW 11,700,000 in total, including the overdue rent and water rate of KRW 900,000 and the overdue rent of KRW 54 months from August 18, 2012 to January 21, 2017 (the court below 2017Gada440) with the court of Gangseo-si branch of the Chuncheon District Court (the court below). On July 20, 2017, the court rendered a judgment ordering the Plaintiff to pay the said amount and its delay damages, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 evidence (the same as Eul 1 evidence), Gap 2 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant did not delay to the Plaintiff at least two vehicles. The fact that the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff of the termination of the instant lease agreement with the instant complaint on March 8, 2018 and the complaint served on the Defendant on March 8, 2018 is apparent in the record. Accordingly, the instant lease agreement was terminated around that time.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the defendant delivers the real estate of this case to the plaintiff, and from January 22, 2017, the above A.

Until the completion date of delivery of real estate as stated in the subsection, it is obligated to pay the rent and unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated at the rate of KRW 200,000 per month.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원안산지원 2019.09.25 2019가단52075

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.31 2017가단69107

-인천지방법원 2017.06.07 2016가단230590

-대구지방법원김천지원 2019.11.12 2019가단2229

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.11.23 2018가단4135