The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is that the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and the surcharge imposed by the court below is too unreasonable;

2. The judgment below's sentence against the defendant is too unfair in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime of this case, although there are favorable circumstances in which the defendant voluntarily surrenders to the crime of this case, these circumstances appears to have been considered when determining the punishment in the court below. Two times the previous departments of this case and the previous departments of this case are two times the previous departments of this case, the defendant committed the crime of this case (2009) during the period of the suspension of the execution of the same kind of crime, the crime of this case itself was committed by administration of phiphones over five times, and other sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence after the crime.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.