The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) and the statement and written diagnosis of injury of victims and witnesses, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and acquitted the Defendant on the part of the victim.

2. Determination

A. The prosecutor of the Amendments to Bill of Indictment: (a) the facts charged by the court below as the primary facts charged; and (b) the court applied for the amendment to Bill of Indictment with the addition of the facts charged of assault as the conjunctive facts charged; and (c) the subject of the trial is changed by permitting it; and (d) the court below found the defendant guilty of the ancillary facts charged; and (e) the court below's judgment that only is the primary

Despite such reasons for ex officio destruction, the argument that the prosecutor's primary facts of the indictment is still subject to the judgment of this court.

나. 주위적 공소사실에 대한 사실 오인 주장에 관한 판단 1) 주위적 공소사실 피해자 C은 2016. 6. 3. 19:00 경 서울 강동구 D에 있는 자신이 운영하는 과일가게에서, 피고인이 위 과일가게에서 사간 과일에 대해 항의하여 서로 말다툼을 하다가 화가 나서 주먹으로 피고인의 가슴을 때리고 밀친 후 손으로 피고인의 이마 등을 긁고 피고인의 손을 꺽어 피고인에게 약 21일 간의 치료가 필요한 중수지 골 및 지골 간 관절에서 손가락인 대의 손상 등을 가하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt 14 days in need of medical treatment, rain dysium, and water dysium, etc., by taking the victim's knife with his knife by hand while making a knife dispute with the victim for the said reasons at the above time and place, and taking the victim's face once.

2) The lower court and the lower court determined that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim among the victim’s statements, E, and F’s statements.