A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On October 20, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million at the Changwon District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 2 million to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on July 28, 2014, respectively.

On July 9, 2017, around 08:50, the Defendant driven a B G80-car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.118% in a section of approximately 2 km to the front road of Seongdong-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Seowon-si, Busan-si, Seoul-si, Seoul-do caner off the front road of 211.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and application of the provisions of the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the above favorable circumstances) of the Criminal Act: (a) the Defendant’s act of committing the instant crime, including the following: (b) the Defendant’s act of committing the instant crime; (c) the motive and circumstance leading up to the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant’s act of committing the instant crime; (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence, and environment; and (e) the Defendant’s various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments were comprehensively considered.