A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at Busan District Court on December 4, 2006.

1. Around 05:50 on November 16, 2019, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.190% 0.19%, and the Defendant was driving B rocketing car at a section of approximately 500 meters from the roads near the Gansan-dong located in the Gansan-dong of Busan to the front of the new Triri-distance located in the same Dong.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the duty of prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those who drive B rocketing cars.

On November 16, 2019, at around 05:50, the Defendant driven the said rocketing car while under the influence of alcohol, and was negligent in performing duties such as neglecting the duty to breath and her right and right and right and right and right and right and right and the right and right and right and right and the right and right and right and the right and duty of operation on the part of the victim E (26 years old) who was in the signal atmosphere at the front of the said B rocketing car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E and the victim G (the 24-year old-age) who is the victim, due to each of the above occupational negligence, such as salt, tension, etc. in each of the following fields: (a) at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the said Fworket car to be repaired in an amount equivalent to KRW 2,969,168, and escaped without immediately stopping the said car and taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act operated the said automobiles as above, which were not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1 as the holder of B rocketing and other automobiles.

4...