logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.01.11 2016고단2571
강제추행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In around 01:00 on September 18, 2016, the Defendant forced indecent act: (a) in the E dormitory located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the Defendant wanted to divide her flock with the victim F (n's flock, 29 years of age) who was flock in the usual workplace, and sought in his room that he did not help the Defendant who was under the influence of his flock; and (b) committed an indecent act on the part of his flock, on the ground that he did not help the Defendant who was under the influence of his flock.

[The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim (the fact that he did not want to do so, but did not do so). Thus, the victim made a false statement to the defendant in order to harm the defendant, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the victim's appearance before and after the prosecution, and the defendant's location and attitude at the time of the indecent act, and the defendant's behavior, etc., are very specific (in some detailed contents, there is a difference between the defendant and the victim in the investigative agency and this court, but it is difficult to see that it was derived from a considerable partial interpretation process, and it is difficult to recognize the credibility of the victim's statement). ii) The victim, who maintained a relationship between the defendant and the defendant as a workplace member at a similar position, has been making a false statement in order to harm the defendant.

In light of the fact that there is no reason to view, the defendant's act of indecent act in this case can be sufficiently recognized, and therefore, the above assertion by the defendant and the defense counsel is without merit)

2. The Defendant, at around 08:00 on September 22, 2016, was killed at the H 1st floor workplace located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, G in Kimpo-si, and at around 08:0 on the same time as that set forth in paragraph 1, but the Defendant was dead, saying, “The Defendant may die a person who died.”

arrow