(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2013.04.23 2013고정36

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2013.04.23 2013고정36

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 15, 2012, the Defendant operated a gallon car at C gallon around 12:35 on October 15, 2012, and operated a two-lane by side of the entrance of a bath in the yellow-dong at Thai-si.

At the same time, in the case of bypassing a two-lane road, a driver has a duty of care to leave the two-lanes in advance, and to safely make a right-hand by checking well the right-hand and right-hand side, but the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to stop immediately and stop the part of the motor vehicle left-hand side of the motor vehicle of the victim D(65 years old) driving from the two-lanes to the upper left-hand side of the motor vehicle of the victim D(65 years old) who is driving from the said two-lanes to the large apartment, and then the right-hand side of the motor vehicle of the said Libers to the above gallon, and did not take necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, field photographs and written estimate copies;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant did not recognize the occurrence of a traffic accident, and there was no intention to commit the violation of the Road Traffic Act (not including the measures to be taken after the accident).

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, namely, the Defendant’s right to the left side of the damaged vehicle that had been driven by the Defendant’s vehicle prior to the time of the instant traffic accident, following the change of the lane into the one while the vehicle was driven by the two lanes.

참조조문

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2015.05.21 2015고단160

-춘천지방법원 영월지원 2013.06.25 2013고단188

-서울중앙지방법원 2012.07.12 2011가단305122

-수원지방법원 2013.08.13 2013고단1049

-서울동부지방법원 2013.01.04 2012고정3148