logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.04.09 2013구단10452
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From around 2008, the Plaintiff was employed by C, who operated the company B, as a daily worker, and performed the construction of a board, poppy, or construction of a strawer, etc. in the existing facilities equipped with special machinery, such as hospital operating rooms, middle patient rooms, etc., so that the Plaintiff does not get out of concrete parts.

B. On November 2012, C entered into a contract with the New Airport Co., Ltd. to perform part of the D Hospital construction located in the Sinpo-si by December 2012, 201 and had workers, including the Plaintiff, work until the end of December, 2012. At the same time, C suspended the relevant process and decided to proceed with the remaining construction from January 17, 2013.

C. Upon receiving a request from C to request the remaining construction work, the Plaintiff was enrolled in Busan on January 16, 2013 as a prisoner of war. D.

On January 17, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) around 08:40 on the fourth floor of the instant D Hospital, in order to perform the stringing of the poppy, the Plaintiff was on the 4th floor of the said D Hospital, by unfolding a double-meter A-type bridge, by drilling a hole on the ceiling, and then cutting the stoppy with a hole by cutting it on the ceiling, and then was subject to the disaster that fell into the floor of the stoppy (hereinafter “the disaster in this case”).

E. The Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Plaintiff at the Busan District Hospital for the instant accident, and filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant for occupational accidents, following the diagnosis of the Plaintiff’s probane-proponing surgery, the ductal ductal ductal ductal surgery, and the cerebral cerebral ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal brain (hereinafter “instant injury”).

F. On April 9, 2013, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of medical care benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that “the Plaintiff is not recognized as a business-related disease with either a prop-to-pat-propulosised surgery from the electric transport connection, and a brain-to-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-p

arrow