Of the facts charged in the instant case, violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection.

The acquittal portion

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On October 21, 2012, the Defendant sent text messages, including, from the time to December 11, 2012, a text message, “I am going out of the Ae-mail, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I

B. At around 07:10 on May 28, 2013, the Defendant of the instant case at 2014 Go-76, using the Internet text delivery site on May 28, 2013, the Defendant sent the victim’s mobile phone (G) with the following contents: “Issing the victim’s mobile phone (G) of the victim’s mobile site,” “Ising the victim’s right to drink, eating, eating, drinking, drinking, singing, drinking, and chewing at night”; “Is the victim’s mobile phone (G)” and “Is the victim’s right to receive the message 4 times repeatedly, which arouses fear to the victim.”

In addition, the Defendant repeatedly sent 14 times a total of 14 times a text message, as shown in the attached Table 2, from 00:40 on June 3, 2013 to 04:21 on June 22, 2013, as shown in the attached Table 2.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by this Court as to the case 2013 High 245, this case’s text messages were sent through the text messages service site (www.hit500or.r., hereinafter “instant site”) operated by the Small and Medium Business Corporation affiliated with the Defendant’s name, and through IP tracking.