logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고정2150
국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 29, 2015, the Defendant obtained permission for the creation of a detached house site from the head of Pyeongtaek-Gun as a person who has obtained permission for wife C with a land category of 459 square meters in Gyeonggi-Gun B.

A person who intends to modify any of the matters permitted for development activities shall obtain permission from the Special Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan City Mayors, Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayors, Special Self-Governing Province Governors, or heads

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission for change, installed a reinforced retaining wall of 24.8 square meters in a size of 24.8 square meters in a size of 24.8 square meters in height after changing the form and quality by raising it at 2.8-4 meters at a height of 2.8 to 4 meters after changing the form and quality, and installing a retaining wall of 24.8 square meters in a size of 24.8 square meters, such as installing a retaining wall of 24.8 square meters in height after changing the form and quality.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A written accusation;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of aerial photography (2014);

1. Article 140 Subparag. 1 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and Articles 140 and 56(2) of the same Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) include: (a) the fact that the facts charged were recognized and reflected in this court; (b) the fact that the relevant laws and regulations were not well-founded; and (c) the fact that the permission for modification

arrow