The defendant shall give C with respect to the real estate stated in the attached Form 1, and with respect to each real estate listed in the attached Form 2.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant’s Dong Jae-si concluded a loan agreement with the Jeju Bank Co., Ltd. (the trade name after the alteration is the Korea Standards Bank, which is a stock company, hereinafter “Japan Bank”), and received the loan accordingly, and the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the principal and interest of the loan against the Jeju Bank.

B. Japan Bank filed a lawsuit against C and B seeking the payment of the principal and interest of each of the above loans and the joint and several sureties's debt amount under the Seoul C & B District Court Decision 95Da195589 and the Seoul Seoul District Court Decision 95Da77624, and won a favorable judgment on July 21, 1995 and December 1, 1995, respectively, and each of the above judgments became final and conclusive around that time.

(c) for C and B of the first bank thereafter;

On December 30, 199, the claims described in the paragraph were transferred to the Reorganization and Finance Corporation, and on December 28, 2000 and July 13, 2001, to the Korea Asset Management Corporation. On March 16, 2005, the Korea Asset Management Corporation filed a lawsuit against C and B seeking payment of the above claims under the Seoul Central District Court No. 2005Da124575, and the decision on performance recommendation was finalized on May 10, 2005.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant claim for acquisition by transfer”) D based on the final decision on performance recommendation.

On August 28, 2012, the Korea Asset Management Corporation transferred the instant obligation to the Plaintiff on September 18, 2012 pursuant to a contract with the Plaintiff on August 28, 2012. On October 8, 2012, the Plaintiff notified C and B of the assignment of the said obligation on behalf of the Korea Asset Management Corporation, a transferor, by means of content-certified mail, respectively, and the said content-certified mail reached C and B around that time.

E. In addition, on May 22, 2013, the Plaintiff is above C.

On June 25, 2013, and November 1, 2013, a certified copy of the above succeeded execution clause was delivered to B and C respectively.

F. Meanwhile, between the defendant and C and B, the separate sheet No. 1 and No. 2 as of December 23, 1993.