A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 30, 2016, at around 02:55, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as franchising and selling the franchis of the above E, and franchising the franchis of the franchis, and franchising the franchis of the franchis; (b) the Defendant was demanded by the victim E, who was on duty at the said police box, to “franchising and returning home” from the victim E, who was on duty at the said police box; and (c) franchis of the franchis of the above E, franchis of the franchis of the fat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties in the police box.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement of police statements of E and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (flags, such as flags of a victim).

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Although the punishment of the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not minor, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the normal materials revealed in the trial process, such as the defendant's age, occupation, and family relationship, and the fact that the defendant is not subject to recidivism while making a confession; that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant; that the victim does not have any previous conviction exceeding the fine; that there is no previous conviction beyond the