1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The purpose of the Plaintiff is to conduct the establishment permission for the establishment of the E-school and to conduct the education for higher education, secondary education, elementary education, technical education, and infant care for G through G. The purpose of the Plaintiff is to conduct the education for higher education, secondary education, elementary education, and infant care.

Defendant B (C) is the operator and reporter of I who is an Internet media, and Defendant C (C) is the reporter of I.

B. The Defendants posted each article of the same content as the [Attachment 1, 2, and 3] written by the Defendants in K, L, M, and N (hereinafter “each article of this case”).

C. The Plaintiff posted each of the instant articles for the purpose of slandering the Plaintiff, and filed a complaint against the Defendants under the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation).

With respect to the above complaint case, the prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office rendered a non-prosecution disposition on the ground that "It is difficult to conclude that the contents of each article of this case are false, and it is difficult to view that the Defendants perceived falsity as false considering the contents of other press reports related to this case, and since the main contents of the article objectively inform the fact that there are procedural problems in the election process of the chief director, it is difficult to regard it as an expression that may damage the reputation of the complainant, and it is difficult to recognize the purpose of defamation against the victim. It is difficult to recognize the purpose of defamation against the victim."

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1-3 evidence, Eul's 1-4 evidence, the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The articles listed in the [Attachment 1] of the Plaintiff’s assertion (i.e., the articles of this case are the chief executive officer of the board of directors by pointing out false facts that theO was frightened by the staff of the board of directors, as well as by the corporate secretariat.