Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff and Defendant B completed the marriage report on January 24, 1996.
B. On December 21, 2006, Nonparty D completed the registration of ownership transfer due to the sale on December 20, 2006 under the name of Defendant B with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).
C. In the Changwon District Court Masan Branch Branch 2012Ra1805 (principal lawsuit), 2013Ra1789 (Counterclaims), etc. brought by Defendant B and the Plaintiff against each other, the said court rendered a judgment on February 18, 2014 that “the Plaintiff shall divorce by the principal lawsuit, Defendant B, and the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff shall pay to Defendant B consolation money 30 million won and the amount equivalent to 5% per annum from May 29, 2012 to February 18, 2014, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.” Defendant B shall be liable to compensate the Plaintiff for property division at the rate of 170 million won and the amount equivalent to 5% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.”
In the above case of the first instance court, the appellate court of Changwon District Court 2014uuu439 (principal lawsuit) and 453 (Counterclaim) divorce, etc. (hereinafter “Divorce case”), the above court shall terminate the pleadings on August 12, 2015, and the part of each claim for division of the principal lawsuit and counterclaim in the first instance judgment on September 9, 2015 shall be modified as follows:
Defendant B shall pay to the Plaintiff 131 million won as division of property and 5% interest per annum from the day following the day on which this judgment became final and conclusive to the day of full payment.
The remaining appeals against the plaintiff by the defendant B and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendant B are dismissed, respectively. The judgment was pronounced, and "the appellate court of this case" is "the appellate court of this case."
On February 3, 2016, an appeal against the above appellate judgment was dismissed. [The facts of no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in the evidence Nos. 5, 10-1, 2, 8 and 9-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments of the evidence No. 5, 10-1, 2, 8 and 9
2. Part on the claim for the registration of ownership transfer against the defendant B
A. The Plaintiff’s respective real estate of this case is owned by the Plaintiff.