All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Improper sentencing for each of the reasons for appeal;

2. We examine the reasoning of the judgment and the prosecutor together.

The court below set a sentence (six months of imprisonment) by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is against each other; (b) the motive and circumstance that led to each of the crimes of this case may be somewhat considered; (c) the obstruction of the performance of official duties not only undermines the function of the State’s legal order by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority; (d) the obstruction of the performance of official duties not only undermines the function of the State’s legal order; and (e) there is a need for strict punishment; (e) the Defendant has been punished for violent crimes several times; and (e) the Defendant committed the crime during the period of repeated offense due to such act; and (e) other means and results, taking into account the circumstances after the crime; (e) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior

The grounds for each unfair sentencing alleged by the defendant and the prosecutor are shown to have been sufficiently considered in determining the punishment against the defendant, and the above sentencing conditions have changed otherwise.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

All the arguments of the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.