logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.04.28 2020고단218
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a bus B.

On October 23, 2019, the Defendant driven the above bus on October 23, 2019, and proceeded along the independent park intersection, which is located in 279 in the unification of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, according to one-lane between the four-lanes in the direction of the independent calendar.

The location was installed with signal lights and at the time, there was a red signal marking on the center of the Defendant's proceeding, so in such a case, the person engaged in the business of driving buses has a duty of care to drive buses safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the part of the D bus driving by the injured party C(the age of 47) who was driven by the injured party C(the age of 47) in accordance with the turn left or left turn from the two-lanes adjacent to the defendant's running direction by negligence in violation of the signal, as the front part of the bus driven by the defendant.

Ultimately, the suspect caused 51 victims, including the victim C, due to the above occupational negligence, to suffer injury, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each traffic accident report;

1. A copy of each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a certificate of origin;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the primary crime and the fact that it appears that damage has been recovered due to bus mutual aid).

arrow