1. The Defendants’ respective Plaintiff KRW 609,844,646 as well as 5% per annum from February 11, 201 to November 9, 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) On February 11, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) dismantled a frush in the underground space of a welfare Dong building among the construction site for the extension of the Daejeon-gu Mamomotophi-dong, Daejeon, Daejeon; and (b) falls under the vadi floor, which has a brupted vad floor that has a brush brush outside the mold brushed, thereby falling under the instant accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendants Company did not have a duty to manage and supervise the safety net and other safety facilities at the time of the accident. The Defendants Company’ safety management or manager was not installed at the time of the accident. The Defendants Company was the construction company of the Daejeon Maelim Construction Co., Ltd., the Defendants Company was the construction company of the construction company of the building project of the building project of the building project of the building project of the building project of the building project of the building project of the building project of the building project of the building project of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, evidence Nos. 2-4, witness B, and C's testimony, witness D, E, and F's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. As an incidental duty under the good faith principle accompanying an employment contract, an employer shall be obligated to take necessary measures, such as improving the human and physical environment so that an employee does not harm life, body, or health in the course of providing his/her labor, and the employer shall be liable to compensate for damages caused by the employee’s breach of such duty of protection.

Supreme Court Decision 200