(영문) 대전지방법원 2012.10.11 2012고단2497

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2012.10.11 2012고단2497

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the above fine is not paid, 50,000 won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving C.

On March 28, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 14:00 and brought about the right side of the Sejong apartment at the front of the entrance of the Sejong apartment, which is located in the Seosung-gu, Daejeon, and brought about a right side of the cryp distance from the Sejong apartment. While the signal, etc. is located at the crosswalk, the Defendant, in violation of the signal, led the victim D (8 years old) crossinging the crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian signals, due to the negligence of violating the signal, caused the collision with the part behind the right side of the above vehicle in which the victim needs to receive approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. According to the medical certificate, the opinion, and the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court as to the defense counsel's argument that there was no occupational negligence or injury, the following facts: (i) the Defendant stated that the Defendant was unable to see the signal while entering the crosswalk at the time of bypassing; (ii) the victim, including the victim, was consistently stated to the police, the prosecution, and the court that the two persons had been on the right side of the roadway; and (iii) the Defendant was consistently stated that the victim was on the right side of the roadway until this court, and (iv) the Defendant was on the right side of the roadway when the Defendant was on the right side of the roadway; and (v) the fact that the victim was on the right side of the roadway immediately after the Defendant was on the right side of the roadway; and (v) the victim was on the right day after the accident that the victim was on the right side of the road and the victim was on the right side of the road.

The above-mentioned facts do not see the signal and entered the crosswalk.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2013.05.22 2012노2571

-서울북부지방법원 2013.11.29 2013노1104

-창원지방법원 2014.08.20 2014고단466

-대전지방법원 2013.02.14 2012노2284

-대법원 1985. 11. 12. 선고 85도1893 판결