(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.11 2014가단61516

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.11 2014가단61516

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 55,326,543 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from November 18, 2013 to December 11, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 15:10 on November 18, 2013, B: (a) driven a C Vehicle (hereinafter “AV”) and proceeded along one lane in front of the bus stops at the front of the bus stops in the defensive East-dong Marine Business Department in Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-dong, U.S. (hereinafter “AV”) from the front side of the traffic distance from the front side of the traffic distance to the front side of the front side of the two-lane; (b) and (c) a shock absorbing is installed at the center of the road. As such, a vehicle driver is obliged to safely drive the vehicle at the center of the road in order to prevent the accident by reporting the front side and the right side traffic situation well and accurately manipulating the steering direction; (d) a driver of the vehicle has neglected his duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the vehicle at the center of the road; and (e) a driver of the vehicle has failed to perform his/her duty of care to operate the vehicle at the center; and (e) a driver has failed to perform his/her duty of care in advance.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as brain-dead sugar, scopic salt pane, etc., due to the instant accident.

C. As to the instant accident, the foregoing B was subject to a disposition not to prosecute (not having the right to prosecute) by the Ulsan District Court 2014 type No. 61516.

The defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the household-related vehicles between the above B and B.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 4, Eul evidence 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the commission of document forwarding to the Ulsan District Prosecutors' Office, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, the accident of this case occurred while the driver B neglected the duty of front-time care and mistakenly operated the steering gear, which led to the negligence of operating the steering gear, in excess of the harming vehicle installed at the center of the road, due to the negligence of operating the steering gear.

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2013.07.25 2013고단1995

-울산지방법원 2015.06.23 2015고단529

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.12.12 2013고정1619

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.10.02 2013고정1203

-창원지방법원 2015.09.23 2015고정699