Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won;
2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 18:10 on July 9, 2014, while the Defendant was engaged in the work of free replacement at the D cafeteria operated by the Defendant in Dongducheon-si, the victim F (E) operator of the next cafeteria (E) who has conflicted due to the issue of the compensation for the damage caused by ordinary water leakage, etc. does not bring the Defendant’s cafeteria into the Defendant’s cafeteria and compensate for the damage, and the Defendant’s knife assaulted the victim by using the Defendant’s knife’s knife’s knife at one time with the Defendant’s knife’s knif
Summary of Evidence
1. The witness F’s statement in the court (the defendant and his defense counsel show that they cannot believe each of the above statements in the investigative agency and court of the witness F. However, the police and the prosecutorial office consistently stated that “F has plucked and plucked up the defendant’s right face with left hand, and thereafter, the defendant was faced with his body fighting, and they exceeded the same floor.” In the court, “I am out of the same face of the defendant’s hand. I am on the left hand. I am against the witness’s statement, but I am against the witness’s hand. I am consistent, the statement’s attitude and content is natural, and some of the above statements were changed as seen above, it appears that F’s statement was credibility when the whole was changed due to the reduction of memory due to satch or time flow.” Thus, F’s statement is judged to have been credibility.”
1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 260 (1) of the same Act
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;
1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;