The first crime is the defendant's judgment.

The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,00 for each of the above fines, and the judgment No. 2.

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court, and the judgment was finalized on November 9, 201, and on May 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspended execution of imprisonment for four months at the Suwon District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 5, 2015.

1. On January 6, 201, the Defendant, using the PC in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 1025, prepared the receipt, “C Office 25 million won, monthly rent of KRW 25 million, monthly rent of KRW 6, January 6, 2011, and the period of use from January 6, 2012. On January 6, 201, the Defendant forged F’s receipt, a private document document for rights and duties, without authority, for the purpose of using it by printing it out to F.

2. The Defendant submitted the forged document as above to the Suwon District Court 6Mo2013Mo2348, Suwon-gu, Suwon District Court 2013Mo2348, which was located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, which was aware of the fact that it was used.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. To describe and present a copy of the forged receipt;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written judgments bound in public trial records, inquiry reports such as criminal records, investigation reports (report on attachment of copies of written judgments to the accused), previous records of disposition and report on results of confirmation, and investigation reports (report on the progress of trials by the accused);

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Between the crimes of the latter part of Articles 37 and 39(1) of the Criminal Act and the crimes of fraud for which judgment has become final and conclusive, and between the crimes of the judgment and the crimes of fraud for which judgment has become final and conclusive. However, according to the aforementioned evidence, the crime of fraud for which judgment has become final and conclusive shall be classified into the crimes of fraud for which judgment has become final and conclusive, etc.