logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.28 2014고단5616
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around March 2, 1995, the Defendant violated the restriction on the vehicle operation of the road management authority in relation to the Defendant’s business by loading and operating freight exceeding 11.4 tons of limited weight exceeding 10 tons on the second axis of B freight vehicles owned by A, an employee of the Defendant, at a 149.5km office located along the Gyeong Highway at the 349.5km point.

2. The Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on the portion that "if an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, not only shall such offender be punished, but also the corporation or individual shall be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act." This portion of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Dec. 2, 2005) applied to the facts charged in the instant case by a public prosecutor. 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 444, 70 (merger)."

3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow