A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a DSP car. The Defendant is a person who is in driving a DSP car.

On June 25, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at a 0.126% alcohol level among blood transfusion around 23:50 on June 25, 2016, had the said car go on a speed of about 50 kilometers per hour depending on the direction of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at the intersection by completing the high-value of the 12-lane 4-lane as the Seocho-gu Seoul Scam.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to keep the safety distance from the front vehicle and to prevent accidents in advance by operating the steering and brakes properly.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant got the victim to use the back part of the F Engine bicycle driven by the victim E (28) who was driven by the victim E (28) due to negligence without properly operating the operation of the operation system, and had the victim use the front part of the F Engine bicycle operated by the defendant on the floor, and served the victim with the front wheels of the left side of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant driven the said car in a situation where it is difficult to drive the car normally due to influence of drinking, and suffered from the injury of the victim, such as four or more cages that require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, or cages at least more than cages.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (dice driving) driven a D SP car at a distance of about 20km from the front day of the buckin in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Fire-Fighting Zone to the high-priced road, which is located in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Fire-Fighting Zone, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.126% during the light of paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act: (a) operated a D SP car without mandatory insurance, with the section of the place specified in paragraph (2) at the time of the first paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on traffic accidents and reports on occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver in charge;