logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.04.15 2016고단200
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2015, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 200, the Defendant, at the Gwangju-si D restaurant located in Gwangju-si on April 23, 2015, and the fact was due to the debt equivalent to KRW 200 million at the time, and did not take over the said debt with the money borrowed from the injured party, and even though there was no intent or ability to pay due to such economic situation, it is necessary to take over the “computer” book to the injured party E.

The loan of KRW 20 million shall be paid 5 million after two weeks, with the principal being aground.

‘A false statement' was made.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 20 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant on the same day and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

The Defendant, on December 2014, at the club located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul around December 2014, 201, hereinafter “2016 high group 372, the Defendant: (a) was in charge of the accounting of the father company; (b) was aware of the fact that the victim was in charge of the accounting of the father company; and (c) was aware of the fact that there was a large amount of money, (c) was in mind to obtain money from the victimized; (d) was fluenced by the flus and the flus in the south-dong, Korea; and (d) operated the “G computer store

There has been false statements.

On March 15, 2015, the Defendant called the victim around 00:53 on March 15, 2015, and there is no card from the taxi to the front of the cash withdrawal period for convenience stores.

In order to transfer money to a customer on a monthly day, it is false that the bank will pay money to the bank immediately after the following month, because it is possible to receive the money from the customer on a monthly day.

However, the Defendant was an employee of the computer store at the time, and was planned to use the money received from the victimized party as personal debt repayment or entertainment expenses, and even if he borrowed money from the victimized party, he did not have any intent or ability to repay it.

arrow