1. The Defendant’s KRW 352,315,354 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from July 16, 2018 to February 13, 2020, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant on the following terms with respect to the stores other than Fho Lake and 57, among the fourth floor of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Complex Building (D building, hereinafter “instant building”) E, 57 stores (hereinafter the same as the attached list, the exclusive area of exclusive use, 579.82m2, hereinafter the same as the “instant stores”), among the fourth floor of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Complex Building (hereinafter “instant building”) E, and the telephone was established at the Incheon District Court on November 23, 2015.

(No. 2015No. 244) lease contract.

1.(a)

The term of lease between the Plaintiff and the Defendant for the instant stores shall be from July 7, 2015 to July 6, 2018, and where the Defendant requests a renewal contract in writing two months before the expiration of the term of lease, the Plaintiff and the Defendant may consult on the renewal period and the rent.

(The store of this case shall be leased at present, and the defendant shall confirm the present state and shall not raise any objection thereto).

The store in this case leases 58 individual number of units indicated in the drawings (the display drawings of the leased part) of the attached Form as a collective building.

Other housing units of the same age are owned by each other, and the other housing units are separate from those of this lease contract.

However, since G is currently owned by the plaintiff, there is no problem that the defendant uses and benefits from the current land, but the subsequent auction is scheduled, so even if the plaintiff fails to acquire ownership again later, the defendant shall not raise an objection.

2.(a)

Upon termination of a lease agreement, the Defendant’s completion of restoration to the original state for the instant stores, and then the deposit 150,000,000 won already paid to the Plaintiff (150,000,000 won paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff on July 1, 2015, which is agreed upon between the parties to substitute for the deposit deposit) shall be the order of deduction of the overdue rent and all taxes and public charges into arrears, taxes and public charges, charges, charges for compelling the performance, penalty charges, etc.