A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized Nos. 5, 6, 7, 9, and 20 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

From around 2013, the Defendant was working as a director at the Yong-Nam headquarters located in Daegu-gu Seoul-gu, as a regional director (a reporter). Since it is difficult for the said D to expect voluntary subscription from an enterprise due to a situation where it is difficult for the Defendant to find out the business that is vulnerable to environmental issues and to publish or file a complaint against the environmental issues, the Defendant had expressed the same attitude that it is difficult for the Defendant to find out the business that is vulnerable to the environmental issues, and to collect money as the price for goods (trademark: the trademark) to which the Defendant was admitted as a member, from the owners of drinking businesses, such as newspaper subscription fees, event support funds, expenses, livestock pens, and multi-level companies (trademark: the trademark) in which the Defendant was admitted as members.

On January 2, 2014, the Defendant sought to the F Office of the F Office, Inc., Ltd., a waste interim disposal business entity located in Northern-gu, Northern-si, Ma, and then filed a complaint with the said company “The head office is H, and the head office was located in the Republic of Korea’s head office to file a complaint with several members of the waste company at the time of filing a complaint with the said company.

It has been found to verify whether it is well.

Whether the business is well-grounded.

Whether there are other environmental reporters who have been found.

Where an enterprise that has a dust in a waste enterprise is located;

"I have the same attitude to prosecute the environmental problem of the above company", and the victim "I have transmitted the crime."

I will take measures to cover water roots and cover and dust.

“The victim continues to demand “to read” and, if the victim did not respond to the demand of the defendant, he/she did act as if he/she accused the company or would suffer any operational disadvantage, and received 180,000 won from the victim, under the pretext of the reading of the newspaper, from January 4, 2013 to November 1, 2016, and received 10,130,000 won in total over 41 times from January 4, 2013 to November 1, 2016, as shown in the list of crimes in the annexed list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. I, J, K, L, M, N,O.